"C-51 is flawed. C-51 is dangerous. C-51 must be
defeated by Parliament." -
Ed
Broadbent
لایحه سی - 51 ناقص است -
خطرناک است . پارلمان میبایست جلوی آنرا بگیرد.
_________________________________________________
Events - C-51 Can't Stop
Us - Public Forum - March 30, 2015 - Nathan
Philips Square - Toronto
Facebook / March
30, 2015 - C-51 Can't Stop Us - Toronto
Syed Hussan (Video)
Syed Hussan Speech (Transcript)
Judy
Da Silva (Video)
Events - Stop C-51 -
Public Demonstration March 12, 2015 - Nathan Phillips Square -
Toronto
Facebook /
March 12,
2015 - Nathan Phillips Square - Toronto Day of Action Against Bill
C-51
Videos
Photos
Album (1) Album (2) Album (3)
Album (4) Album (5)
Album (6) Album (7)
Album (8) Album (9)
Articles
|
|
|
Bill C-51 wraps up at committee with few
changes
Not one of
the more than 100 amendments submitted by
opposition parties to try and change the
government’s much-criticized anti-terror
bill were adopted as a House of Commons
committee wrapped up its study of the
legislation.
MPs adopted
three minor amendments — the ones tabled by
the Conservatives and leaked late last week.
The government amendments included changes
to the “lawful protest” aspect of the bill,
which clarifies CSIS does not have law
enforcement powers and puts limitations on
Canada’s public safety minister’s ability to
direct airlines in efforts to prevent
terrorist activities. |
Anti-terror Bill C-51 to be changed as
Tories respond to criticism
1- The
government will also put forward an
amendment to make it clear that CSIS agents
would not have the power to arrest people. |
|
Open letter to Parliament: Amend C-51 or kill it!
Dear Members of Parliament,
Please accept this collective open
letter as an expression of the signatories’ deep concern
that Bill C-51 (which the government is calling the
Anti-terrorism Act, 2015) is a dangerous piece of
legislation in terms of its potential impacts on the
rule of law, on constitutionally and internationally
protected rights, and on the health of Canada’s
democracy.
|
Anti-terrorism bill C-51 'dangerous' legislation, 100
academics say More than 100 academics
are urging the government to drastically
alter C-51, the Conservatives' proposed
anti-terrorism legislation, arguing it is
far too broad and doesn't come with
safeguards to protect Canadians' privacy
rights.
The group, made up mainly
of law professors from across Canada, have
signed an open letter arguing the proposed
bill has major problems that threaten
Canadians' privacy and freedom of speech. |
Canada is no home for Bill C-51
A family protesting
clear-cut logging on Haida Gwaii;
grandparents speaking out against war; First
Nations blocking a pipeline through their
traditional lands; union workers engaged in
a wildcat strike; fishermen opposed to oil
tanker traffic; filmmakers documenting civil
disobedience; journalists advocating an
independent Quebec — what do each of these
groups have in common?
Each could be charged with
terrorism under the Conservative’s draconian
Bill C-51, which would criminalize any
action deemed a threat to the economic and
financial security of Canada, to critical
infrastructure or to Canada’s diplomatic
relations.
|
Quebec's not so quiet revolution, and why
we all need to join it! |
Bill C-51 bars CSIS from committing 'bodily
harm,' sexual violation
The government's proposed
anti-terror legislation expands the powers
of Canadian Security Intelligence Service to
allow it to "disrupt" suspected terrorist
threats — but it also expressly prohibits
CSIS from killing or seriously injuring a
subject.
What's not clear exactly
is where the line between those activities
is drawn and what that means for the agency
when it comes to interrogation techniques,
experts on civil liberties and security
point out.
|
|
Walrus - Bill C-51:
the Good, the Bad . . . and the Truly Ugly
Bill C-51, the Harper government’s recently proposed
“Anti-terrorism Act,” restructures our national security laws so
extensively that it will take years before we understand the law’s
full effect. There is good in the act, but there also is bad, and
even truly ugly. The details are difficult for non-experts to
navigate. That is why we are providing Walrus readers with this
summary.
از نکات مثبت این لایحه اینست که با امور امنیتی کشور
از طریق قوانین برخورد خواهد شد و نه از طریق مصوباتی که دولت با
استفاده از قدرت خود به اجرا در میاورد . یک از این موارد لیست
آنهائی میباشد که ممنوعیت پرواز دارند که سابق بر این ضوابط مشخصی
نداشته است.
برخوردهای شدی و بازجوهائی خشونت آمیز بعد از
حوادث یازده سپنامبررایج گردیدند. این خطر وجود دارد که این لایحه این
نوع رفتار ها را در کانادا متداول کند، بخصوص که مدت بازداشت شخص مورد
سوء ظن طبق این لایحه از سه روز به هفت روز افزایش پیدا میکند.
|
Anti-terror Bill C-51 to be changed as
Tories respond to criticism
The government will propose a
handful of amendments to the proposed
anti-terror bill when it goes to
clause-by-clause review on Tuesday, CBC News
has learned, including a proposal that would
protect protests from being captured by the
new measures. |
Bill C-51: NDP outlines plan to scrap
'dangerous provisions'
March 27
They will also put forward a number of
substantive amendments, including:
- Restoring the position of CSIS inspector
general, which was abolished in 2012.
- Regular reports to the House by the
Security Intelligence Review Committee.
- Stricter limits on information-sharing
provisions to cover only terrorism.
- Stronger privacy protections throughout
the bill.
- Sunset clauses and mandatory review
requirements.
تغییرات پیشنهادی حزب نیو
دموکرات
- برقراری مجدد سمت بازرس سازمان اطلاعات
که در سال 2012 منحل شده بود.
- ارائه گزارش به پارلمان
- محدود کردن اشتراک گذاری اطلاعات فقط به
موارد تروریستی
- حمایت از حریم خصوصی قوی تر در سراسر این
لایحه.
- تعیین محدودیت زمانی و نیاز
به بررسی مجدد |
Excerpted from Civil Disobedience by Henry
David Thoreau - 1849.
Very relevant today still. |
Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to
obey them, or shall we endeavour to amend
them, and obey them until we have succeeded,
or shall we transgress them at once? Men
generally, under such a government as this,
think that they ought to wait until they
have persuaded the majority to alter them.
They think that , if they should resist,
they remedy would be worse than the evil.
But it is
the fault of the government itself that the
remedy is worse than the evil. But is it the
fault of the government itself that the
remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it
worse.
Why is it not more apt to anticipate and
provide for reform?
Why does it not cherish its wise minority? |
Why
does it cry and resist before it is hurt?
Why does it not encourage it's citizens to
be on the alert to point out its faults, and
do better than it would have them? Why does
it always crucify Christ, and excommunicate
Copernicus and Luther, and pronounce
Washington and Franklin rebels?
One would think, that a deliberate and
practical denial of its authority was the
only offence never contemplated by
government; else, why has it not assigned
its definite, its suitable and
proportionate, penalty? If a man who has no
property refuses but once to earn nine
shilling for the State, he is put in prison
for a period unlimited by any law that I
know, and determined only by the discretion
of those who placed him |
there, but if he should steal ninety times
nine shillings from the State, he is soon
permitted to go at large again.If the
injustice is part of the necessary friction
of the machine of government, let it go, let
it go; perchance it will wear smooth -
certainly the machine will wear out. If the
injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a
rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself,
then perhaps you may consider whether the
remedy will not be worse than the evil; but
if it is of such a nature that if requires
you to be the agent of injustice to another,
then, I say, break the law. Let your life be
a counter friction to stop the machine. What
I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I
do not lend myself to the wrong which I
condemn. |
“We want to be safe, but we need to be free.”
“Just because you have security concerns doesn’t
mean you can infringe upon people’s Charter rights.”
|